Professors: Underutilised treasure in our universities?
June 13, 2012, 7:26 pm , the island
by Professor Ranjith Senaratne,
Vice Chairman, University Grants Commission
Vice Chairman, University Grants Commission
Continued from yesterday
Critical examination of the role of Professor in a seat of higher learning
A
professor occupies the highest echelon in the career of academic, who
could make a substantial contribution to the advancement of academic
and research activities, image building and institutional development.
The Professoriate also probably represents the most important
intellectual resource and asset of a higher education institution. Thus
it is not unreasonable to expect a great deal from professors. Yet,
strangely enough, the role of a professor remains undefined and no job
description exists for a university professor. This seems to be the
case in most of the universities in the world including the UK. In view
of this lacuna, Prof. Bruce Macfarlane at Faculty of Education at the
University of Hong Kong carried out extensive research on this subject,
which led to a seminal publication titled "Intellectual Leadership in
Higher Education: Reviewing the Role of the University Professor". He
argues that Professor is not only a career grade, but also a leadership
role.
Professors through their cutting edge
research occupy a place on the frontiers of knowledge and hold a share
in moving them forward. The new knowledge generated gives rise to new
discoveries, theories, frameworks, critiques, analyses and models,
which others draw upon and are influenced by. Thus they are prominent
"academic citizens" who apply their disciplinary or professional
specialism for enhancing scholarly and public outreach work; and
thereby they occupy leadership position in scholarly societies. They
could influence policy makers through public debate on social, moral,
cultural, political and environmental issues and help to form and mould
public opinion. In addition, professors have a moral obligation to
stand up against undemocratic and oppressive moves by regimes and
external agents, even when such interventions fall outside their
immediate area of expertise.
However, it should
be stressed that not necessarily all professors in the Sri Lankan
Universities belong to the class of intellectual elite or be considered
a treasure. Regrettably, some have contributed minimally to the
advancement and dissemination of knowledge even in their own fields; and
have not published in any indexed journal so that their "international
presence" is invisible. Moreover, as per the current evaluation
procedure, possessing a doctoral degree is not a pre-requisite to
become a professor. In many countries in the world, including
neighbouring India, a PhD is a must to become a professor. Weaknesses
in the Circular No. 916 have led to the regrettable situation in Sri
Lanka. The circular is presently under review by the UGC with a view to
closing the gap. There is a also a growing concern that some professors
in certain faculties are engaged in consultancy work during working
hours because of attractive remunerations. This has affected their
availability at the university. This is unhealthy and appropriate steps
need to be taken to prevent such improper practices.
In
a knowledge economy, universities the world over are moving away from
the classical intellectual model towards a more pragmatic,
business-oriented and entrepreneurial model. They expect professors to
be knowledge entrepreneurs generating income from their intellect
through capitalization of knowledge, consultancies, patents and other
means. However, owing to academic conservatism, some Vice Chancellors
remain averse to this seemingly commercial model and reject the idea
that university professors should contribute to wealth creation through
transformation of new ideas and knowledge into innovative products,
processes or services. Professor Macfarlane in his article in the Times
Higher Education of 17 November, 2011 has put forward the following
five suggestions in order to make fuller use of professors as
intellectual leaders.
1. Expect all Professors to contribute locally
Professors,
by definition are, cosmopolitan, and they identify with international
research groups and scholarly societies. Yet, they should be engaged in
mentoring and promoting the career progression of junior staff in
their own institution and contributing to it as a community. The
Universities should develop a mechanism to get the most out of
Professors with respect to institutional development.
2. Value creativity and originality over productivity
The
academic productivity of Professors is primarily measured by the
number of publications in indexed journals and their impact is gauged in
terms of citations. In certain instances, research is concentrated in
highly specialized fields and papers emanating from research are
published in a narrow range of journals. Evaluating professors in this
way may increase productivity in a narrow sense, but it does precious
little to promote creativity and originality. In addition to the
intellectual merits of a research proposal, professors need to align
their research to university goals and objectives and to regional and
national development. To facilitate such a shift, the Universities need
to evolve a mechanism to support innovative and novel research in line
with national needs, contributing to value creation. Here it is
necessary to adopt a balanced approach providing for non-themed or
blue-sky research as well as themed research.
3. Make better use of Emeritus and Retired Professors
Passionate
commitment to intellectual pursuits does not necessarily diminish with
age. This is substantiated by the fact that some of the most
influential Professors in the modern world such as Richard Dawkins,
Noam Chomsky and Germaine Greer are emeritus in status. We can take the
cue from US institutions that have established Emeritus Colleges, which
offers retired Professor an opportunity to continue teaching and
research. This also affords more opportunities for the junior academics
to receive advice and guidance for career progression and professional
development. In fact the UGC is currently in the process of developing
a data base of retired Professors with a view to obtaining their
services to reinforce and consolidate the new initiatives of the
Government for the internationalization of our Universities and
improving their world ranking with the objective of making Sri Lanka an
educational hub. They could also contribute towards making up academic
deficiencies in newly established Universities and provide able and
mature academic leadership to the new academic institutions being
established, both public and private, so as to improve access to higher
education
4. Nurture and guide Professors
An
academic who has satisfied the criteria to be appointed a professor
may not instantly be able to perform as an intellectual leader. Like
anybody else, newly appointed professors need guidance and development
to help them discharge their role effectively. This will obviously not
include as Prof. Macfarlane put it, an anodyne induction into
‘University Processes and Procedures", but a short programme by
experienced professors on how to articulate the new role – a role that
goes beyond the pursuit of personal publication and income generation
to embrace activities and initiatives aimed at helping universities to
attain their goals and realize their dreams and potential.
Continued tomorrow
No comments:
Post a Comment